Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Of LoLBins, 0-Days, ESET, and Microsoft Defender
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 107474" data-source="post: 1083461"><p>1. It would be strange when vendors would harden against imaginary routes.</p><p></p><p>2. Be carefull what you wish, let Cruel Sister's follow up video do the talking <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>3. As stated a PoC demonstrates that something can be exploited in a repeatable and predictable manner in a real world environment. Vendors do respond to this as does ESET (in jan 2024)</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://support.eset.com/en/ca8602-eset-customer-advisory-unquoted-path-privilege-vulnerability-in-eset-products-for-windows-fixed[/URL]</p><p></p><p>So let me repeat my question: When vendors take PoC's seriously, why do you consider an "actual in the wild distributed via route of infection" as the only valid proof?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 107474, post: 1083461"] 1. It would be strange when vendors would harden against imaginary routes. 2. Be carefull what you wish, let Cruel Sister's follow up video do the talking :) 3. As stated a PoC demonstrates that something can be exploited in a repeatable and predictable manner in a real world environment. Vendors do respond to this as does ESET (in jan 2024) [URL unfurl="true"]https://support.eset.com/en/ca8602-eset-customer-advisory-unquoted-path-privilege-vulnerability-in-eset-products-for-windows-fixed[/URL] So let me repeat my question: When vendors take PoC's seriously, why do you consider an "actual in the wild distributed via route of infection" as the only valid proof? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top