Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Of LoLBins, 0-Days, ESET, and Microsoft Defender
Message
<blockquote data-quote="devjit2020" data-source="post: 1083474" data-attributes="member: 94800"><p>Relax guys. No need of fighting & arguing. We all know that ESET is a top tier product. Cruel sister is not bashing anybody but then again this test does not prove that ESET is ineffective. Protection is a very broad term and depends mainly on the user. I have used Kaspersky & Bitdefender in the past but have found myself always coming back to ESET & F-Secure. Although the former 2 are much better in protection, I always found them intrusive in my gaming PC whereas the latter 2 are extremely light & I don’t even notice them running. They also have kept me infection free for the past 5 years although my common sense is the topmost factor. We all have our preferences and CS likes Comodo above all other solutions. Does that mean that Comodo is the best? No…every time I install Comodo I end up uninstalling it because of performance issues, gui glitches & bugs. We all know that ESET didn’t bat an eye since the file was not malicious and this behaviour is expected from ESET. If the downloaded file was malicious and if the lolbin tried to connect to a malicious server then probably we would have seen ESET in action. So we have it- neither has CS bashed ESET and neither is this test a valid one to prove if the security solution can protect a user or not. God help them who have uninstalled ESET by watching this video because it’s clearly not what CS has tried to prove through this video.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="devjit2020, post: 1083474, member: 94800"] Relax guys. No need of fighting & arguing. We all know that ESET is a top tier product. Cruel sister is not bashing anybody but then again this test does not prove that ESET is ineffective. Protection is a very broad term and depends mainly on the user. I have used Kaspersky & Bitdefender in the past but have found myself always coming back to ESET & F-Secure. Although the former 2 are much better in protection, I always found them intrusive in my gaming PC whereas the latter 2 are extremely light & I don’t even notice them running. They also have kept me infection free for the past 5 years although my common sense is the topmost factor. We all have our preferences and CS likes Comodo above all other solutions. Does that mean that Comodo is the best? No…every time I install Comodo I end up uninstalling it because of performance issues, gui glitches & bugs. We all know that ESET didn’t bat an eye since the file was not malicious and this behaviour is expected from ESET. If the downloaded file was malicious and if the lolbin tried to connect to a malicious server then probably we would have seen ESET in action. So we have it- neither has CS bashed ESET and neither is this test a valid one to prove if the security solution can protect a user or not. God help them who have uninstalled ESET by watching this video because it’s clearly not what CS has tried to prove through this video. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top