- Nov 9, 2022
- 302
Currently no info on the Norton Forum
As soon as Norton post the changelog , i will update this thread.
As soon as Norton post the changelog , i will update this thread.
Norton Security 22.24.2.6 for Windows is now available!
- Thread starter Jengo
- Start date
Bot
AI-powered Bot
- Apr 21, 2016
- 3,619
Thank you for your patience. We appreciate your commitment to keeping this thread updated.
- Apr 15, 2020
- 297
- Mar 2, 2023
- 804
Jengo, I'm sure I speak for many here when I say, "thank you" for keeping us up to date with Norton and its product line-up, and in creating the threads
Last edited:
- Nov 9, 2022
- 302
@Jonny Quest thanks but no need to thank me.
Glad you like the Norton topics.
Glad you like the Norton topics.
- Feb 7, 2023
- 1,775
More under-the-hood changes and minor improvements 
- May 17, 2015
- 673
- Apr 4, 2021
- 303
"
- Branding updates
- Minor bug fixes
- Under-the-hood changes, and performance enhancements
Last edited by a moderator:
I have to say Norton is overly hated because of its past reputation. I'm testing Norton 360 for Gamers, and it's perfectly fine in all aspects.
- Apr 15, 2020
- 297
And do you experience any difference? Is it worth using the Gamer edition or does the regular version do the same?
- Feb 7, 2023
- 1,775
Unless the gaming optimiser will add a second CPU benefits will be close to none.
I don't use that feature. I'm testing Norton 360 for Gamers version because I received a free one-year key.
- Apr 4, 2021
- 303
On my old laptop, Kerish's game optimizer gave me 10 fps in conditions of trottling and 30% CPU load, and most importantly, it removed the fps spikes. Since then I don't consider optimizers useless.
Although about norton I really don't remember whether I felt its optimizer during a year of use or not.
- Feb 7, 2023
- 1,775
Yeah well that largely depends on your hardware and software environment.On my old laptop, Kerish's game optimizer gave me 10 fps in conditions of trottling and 30% CPU load, and most importantly, it removed the fps spikes. Since then I don't consider optimizers useless.
Optimisers work by suspending unnecessary tasks (which on Windows are quite a lot) and by prioritising the game executable(s).
It is possible to achieve some speedup this way, but mostly it is just a placebo.
The Norton Game Optimiser was inherited by Bullguard, which was really popular and highly praised amongst gamers.
- Apr 15, 2020
- 297
Which programme is this exactly?On my old laptop, Kerish's game optimizer gave me 10 fps in conditions of trottling and 30% CPU load, and most importantly, it removed the fps spikes. Since then I don't consider optimizers useless.
- Feb 7, 2023
- 1,775
Kerish Doctor it should be.
Kerish PC Doctor - Complete PC Care Software
Kerish PC Doctor - PC Troubleshooting, Cleaning, Performance Optimization, and Anti-Malware
www.kerish.org
- Apr 15, 2020
- 297
Thank you.Kerish Doctor it should be.
Kerish PC Doctor - Complete PC Care Software
Kerish PC Doctor - PC Troubleshooting, Cleaning, Performance Optimization, and Anti-Malware
Is this a free or paid program?Is it reliable?
- Feb 7, 2023
- 1,775
Users at MalwareTips usually highly praise it and prefer it to other optimisers. It is paid.
I personally advise against the usage of such (and not only me, for example this has been the position of various security companies such as MalwareBytes throughout the years).
Whilst calling TuneUP software PUP is farfetched, a lot of it has almost no benefit and is just a waste of time.
Again, it depends on your hardware and software situation. Provided that you’ve got a modern device and you only install what you need, optimisers should not be necessary.
- Apr 4, 2021
- 303
It is paid, but inexpensive. There is a 15-day trial period with no limitations in functionality. Sometimes there are promotions when you get a free code for a year, but you can't guess.
The program is made in Russia, but it has a good reputation. At one time there was a scandal that Eset detected it as a PUP, but they were able to solve it. There was just a problem that they called minor registry errors as problems and Eset considered it a user scam.
