Thank you, I'll do that.
OmniDefender - New Antivirus Software 2025
- Thread starter OsirisXD
- Start date
Thank you, I'll do that.
I would give sciter a try… though it may take time to understand it. You’ll have to read the documentation.
Sorry if I came across as blunt or offensive it’s just that there are so many so-called “Next-Gen AV” projects that turn out to be complete jokes, and it gets frustrating.
I’m not singling you out in particular.
If I can give you one piece of advice: roll your project back to BETA, make it free and open, let people test it, report bugs, and help you build a stable foundation before trying to monetize it.
I’m saying this for your own good I’ve spent seven years developing an anti-malware solution myself, and I know firsthand how much rigor and technical depth this kind of work truly requires.
I learned few historical and cyber security lessons from OmniDefender. He tried create antivirus from scratch which is no longer possible (but he still trying because I see him from discord and it's still active). Open source signatures exists for detect old malware and there too many open source tools for antivirus. You must a big company to do write everything from scratch and become powerful otherwise you only get open source tools or ML, HIPS, (maybe zero trust) based antivirus.
Even if the zero trust needs big whitelist. Avoiding false positives is biggest hard task because one false positive isn't equal to 100 detections, so even if you have 100% detection rate one big false positive might break entire system and reverse thing might be happen too. For example 99% detection doesn't mean 100% protection and one missed malware can destroy entire system.
People excepting high quality malware with these prices. You must make him free if you want continue or even better create minimal open source SDK to allow people help to improve this antivirus.
You need an different thing to help people choice your antivirus. Don't make the money is first at new product you are not big company. You should make quality first not quantity. Otherwise you going to fail. Also you need always make the antivirus up to date otherwise people will forget you and you have outdated software.
The most good antiviruses still very old, other ones are copycat or bad.
The malwares evolving and getting complex so you need everything not only signatures or ML or HIPS or behaviour protection. You need all of them.
Edit: Typo.
Even if the zero trust needs big whitelist. Avoiding false positives is biggest hard task because one false positive isn't equal to 100 detections, so even if you have 100% detection rate one big false positive might break entire system and reverse thing might be happen too. For example 99% detection doesn't mean 100% protection and one missed malware can destroy entire system.
People excepting high quality malware with these prices. You must make him free if you want continue or even better create minimal open source SDK to allow people help to improve this antivirus.
You need an different thing to help people choice your antivirus. Don't make the money is first at new product you are not big company. You should make quality first not quantity. Otherwise you going to fail. Also you need always make the antivirus up to date otherwise people will forget you and you have outdated software.
The most good antiviruses still very old, other ones are copycat or bad.
The malwares evolving and getting complex so you need everything not only signatures or ML or HIPS or behaviour protection. You need all of them.
Edit: Typo.
Last edited:
You may also like...
-
-
-
McAfee Total Protection 5-Device: 1-Year Subscription
- Started by Brownie2019
- Replies: 2
-
-